The Washington Post has joined the New York Times in admitting that Hunter Biden's laptop was real. New York Post. The paper said that it had used cryptographic techniques to confirm the authenticity of 22,000 e-mails from Hunter Biden on the laptop. Included in these e-mails are Biden's contacts with a Chinese energy company and the infamous Ukrainian energy company Bursima Holdings. The Washington Post had claimed that the laptop story was debunked when the New York Post broke the story in October of 2020. Hunter Biden left the laptop at a repair shop and did not pay for the repairs.
My Comment:
I covered the New York Times admitting that the laptop from hell was real here. Like in that story I am not linking directly to the Washington Post. Why? Because they killed the story in the first place. They should get no credit for doing the right thing way after it was too late to prevent Joe Biden from getting into office.
And I consider killing this story to be another example of how the 2020 election was not legitimate. If the news media had done their due diligence here in an election that was so close there was basically no chance of Biden winning. But the news media colluded with big tech and the Democratic Party to utterly kill the story.
It turns out that the story was even more relevant than we thought back in 2020. With Ukraine dominating the news I would think that having a president that has been credibly accused of receiving kickbacks from Ukraine is a really big deal. Given our policy is 100% in favor of Ukraine it's worth it to ask if that is because Joe Biden actually believes they are the good guys or because he doesn't want the gravy train to end.
I also have to say that the media is still ignoring the more salacious threads from the story. Hunter Biden was seen on video having sex with prostitutes and doing all kinds of drugs. But there was also the theory that he may have molested his niece, Natalie Biden. That story has not been confirmed as even the New York Post doesn't want to touch it but there is a circumstantial case to be made. That too would have prevented Biden from being elected if it was confirmed.
I do wonder why these two papers have switched course. It could be because they are cutting Joe Biden loose. It's hard to argue that Biden has been anything but a total failure and the newspapers may not want to expend any more political capital on someone that has no chance of winning in 2024. They may also be upset with Biden for not following their priorities
No comments:
Post a Comment