Karmelo Anthony convicted of murder and sentenced to 35 years for the killing of Austin Metcalf

 

Karmelo Anthony. ABC News/Frisco PD.

Karmelo Anthony has been convicted of murder and sentenced to 35 years in prison for the killing of Austin Metcalf. ABC News. Anthony stabbed Metcalf after being confronted for trespassing in a tent at a track meet. Anthony argued that the stabbing was justified self defense as Metcalf had shoved Anthony, but they jury did not agree. The trial did not go well for the defense with many students testifying that Anthony had been asked to leave and that he had threatened Metcalf before the murder. Another witness said that Metcalf had specifically told Anthony that he didn't want to fight him. The jury found Anthony guilty in just three hours and were able to sentence him the same day. 

My Comment:

The jury reached the right verdict as the evidence against Karmelo Anthony was extreme and incontrovertible. He entered a tent he had no right to be in and he refused to leave when asked. He made a threat against Metcalf for no reason and escalated the situation to the point where Metcalf shoved him. Instead of shoving him back or walking away, Anthony stabbed Metcalf and killed him in cold blood. 

Self defense didn't apply in this case. Not only was Anthony the aggressor, he had no valid reason to fear for his life. Metcalf even said that he didn't want to fight! And when Metcalf did shove him, Anthony responded with a massive overreaction in force. Stand your ground didn't apply and even by the rules of regular self defense, you can't stab someone who shoves you when you are in a place that forbids weapons and that you have no right to be in in the first place. 

Despite these being the facts of the case, Anthony somehow has supporters. If you are charitable you could say that they somehow believed that he wasn't the aggressor here, or they simply don't seem to understand the laws of self defense. To be fair, most people don't understand that, how else could people think that Kyle Rittenhouse wasn't justified after being chased, assaulted and having a gun pulled on him? 

But it's pretty obvious that this case was just about racism. Anthony wasn't the victim of racism, I doubt Metcalf would have acted any different if Anthony was White or any other race. But I am guessing most of Anthony's supporters just hate White people and think he should get off because he killed one. 

Indeed, they are complaining about an jury with no Black people on it, but they forget to point out that some of the Black jurors disqualified themselves by saying they wouldn't convict Anthony no matter what the facts of the case were. The three that passed that bar were rejected because they were all educators and the prosecution correctly argued that they couldn't be trusted to be impartial in a case that happened at a high school. 

Regardless, I am happy that justice was served in this case. I do think the sentence was fairly lite given that he killed someone, but it's fair under the laws of Texas. At the very least, he won't be getting out anytime soon. Supposedly, if he behaves, he could be out halfway through his sentence, but I really don't see that happening with the facts of this case. 

LA Mayor race called after ballot drop knocked Spencer Pratt out of the race.

 

Nithya Raman. New York Post.

The Los Angeles Mayor's race has been called with far left Nithya Raman knocking out insurgent GOP candidate Spencer Pratt. New York Post. Pratt was in 2nd place after incumbent Mayor Karen Bass on election day but late votes swung towards Raman. With 93% of the vote in, Bass leads with 34.7% of the vote, Raman with 28.5% and Pratt with 26.7%. Pratt, a former reality TV star, ran on improving the city and specifically the Bass's poor reaction to the Pacific Palisades fire, that ruined the neighborhood and even destroyed Pratt's house. The slow pace of the vote and disproportionate results favoring Raman has caused withering criticism among voters and has caused President Trump to open an investigation to elections in California. 

My Comment:

In a democracy, the appearance of voter fraud has the same effect as voter fraud. It causes people to lose faith in the elections and that is a recipe for disaster. People will accept the results of an election if they lose fairly, but if it takes weeks to count votes and those votes tend to support one candidate over another, than folks are going to be rightly upset. 

Was there fraud in this election? Right now it's not possible to know, largely because of how horrible California's elections are designed. They allow mail in ballots, and the only restriction is that they have to be mailed out by election day. They also allow ballot harvesting, and have weak signature verification laws and allow many suspect ballots to count. 

Given that it would be trivial for a small operation to absolutely change the course of an election. All you would need is a ballot harvesting operation that targets people that are ineligible or unlikely to vote, like at rest homes or on Skid Row. Did that happen? There are, of course, rumors, but without absolute proof we can't say either way. 

Nobody has any faith in the elections in California and everyone is assuming that Spencer Pratt will be kicked out by a late ballot drop in favor of Nithya Raman. The betting markets know this and are pricing it accordingly. https://t.co/PE2FYCYIz0

— Jeff H (@politicswarblog) June 4, 2026

Indeed, this is exactly what I predicted for the LA Mayor race a day after the election. Pratt was comfortably in 2nd place on election day and folks though he had a chance to stand for election in November. Remember, California has a "jungle primary" where the top two candidates run, regardless of party. That means in most elections, there is no GOP candidate to vote for and there was hope that in LA and the Governor's race there would finally be a Republican on the ballot in November.  But that hope was unfounded in Los Angeles, though it hasn't been ruled out for the Governor's race as of this writing. 

And I don't buy that this is how things have to be. Other states handle their elections a lot quicker and they don't allow the ballot harvesting and curing that California does. Indeed, a country as dysfunctional as India, with almost a billion voters, gets their results in a day. There is zero reason why California could not be as functional as India when it comes to votes. 

As for Pratt, he ran an impressive campaign, and if he had ran in anything other than a deep blue, one-party state like California, he could have won the general election, let alone the primary. He ran how Republicans should run in blue cities like LA, instead of focusing on Republican priorities, he tried to connect with the voters directly himself. He was almost a single issue voter, fixing LA's massive problem with mismanagement, crime and disaster recovery. That's a winning formula for blue cities that have been under the control of the Democrats for generations. 

I do think that this might be the "last straw" when it comes to California's elections. I know the Supreme Court has a case pending about the very issue of late ballots received after election day and a favorable and expected ruling would end these kinds of shenanigans right away. 

And there is also some motivation from the Trump administration to fix this. After the election in 2016, I had hoped that Trump would focus on election security but he was prevented from doing so by the Republicans in the House and Senate. I think this time he will have a freer hand as it's getting obvious to everyone that the situation in California is untenable.  

President Zelensky has sent a letter to President Putin asking for face to face negotiations to end the Ukraine War.

 

Ukrainian President Zelensky. BBC/EPA.

President Zelensky has sent a letter to President Putin asking for a face to face negotiation to end the war between Russia and Ukraine. BBC. Zelensky asked for a full ceasefire while the issue was being negotiated, a condition that Putin has repeatedly rejected. Despite asking for a ceasefire and an end to the war, the letter was disrespectful and defiant, and even mocked Putin's age. However, the more notable issue is that Zelensky acknowledged that the United States attention was on Iran, not the Ukraine war. For his part President Trump agreed that a face to face meeting would be helpful. 

My Comment:

It appears that Zelensky is feeling confident, probably because it's late spring and well past winter. Putin's war on Ukraine's energy was largely successful but it's a lot less relevant in spring and summer in Ukraine for what should be obvious reasons. Nobody is at risk of freezing to death in Ukraine in June. 

And it's not like there has been much movement in the war. The front lines are mostly static and neither side seems to be engaged on any major offensives. Ukraine has gotten more aggressive with drone strikes, just today they appear to have damaged or destroyed the Russian Corvette RFS Boiky in drydock in St. Petersburg. Those strikes may get headlines but they have not eroded Russia's ability to make war. 

Keep in mind that Russia's goal here is attritional warfare, they understand they have more manpower, weapons and supplies than Ukraine ever will and they just need to continue to keep up the pressure and Ukraine will eventually collapse. The only problem is that this strategy takes a long time.

It also seems that Ukraine has adapted as well. They haven't launched a major offensive in awhile and I don't think we will see any more major offensives from Ukraine unless something drastic happens. I think they finally figured out that throwing huge numbers of troops into Russian defenses was a dumb idea. Either that or their non-drone operator troop quality has dropped to the point where they can't actually do anything. 

Regardless, the timing of this is dumb. The time for Ukraine to try and cut a deal was back when they had a large amount of Russian territory during the Kursk offensive. But they didn't really try to end the war then, when they obviously could have used that territory to trade for their own. Now they control very little if any Russian territory so they have nothing to trade. 

It's true that Trump is obviously distracted by Iran but I think he mostly washed his of Ukraine regardless. I do think he wants to end the war but I also don't think he takes responsibility for the conflict. He, correctly, believes this was Joe Biden's war and it's going to be up to Ukraine and Russia to end the war. 

The problem I see is that I don't see any evidence of either side backing down. Russia won't give up all of the territory they have conquered and that's not going to change. At the very least, they will keep Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk and Ukraine has no realistic way to take that territory back. But Ukraine won't drop demands to be given back all of this territory and more, even Crimea, which had been taken by Russia before the war. 

Until one side loosens their demands I can't see this war ending. Even worse, I don't think anything at all will come from this letter. Zelensky's bad attitude isn't helping either. My guess is that nothing will come from this letter and that the war will continue. 

President Trump confirms he had a spat with Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel.

 

President Trump and Prime Minster Netanyahu. Reuters.

President Trump has confirmed that he had a spat with Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel over his attacks on Lebanon. Reuters. Trump confirmed an Axios report where he was quoted as calling the Prime Minster "crazy". Trump also was quoted as saying "You're fucking crazy. You'd be in prison if it ⁠weren't for me. I'm saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this." and "At some point, I said, ​Bibi, we got to stop this. We got to stop it." referring to the conflict with Lebanon. Trump said he wasn't angry at Netanyahu but was "perturbed" that he kept attacking Lebanon. Netanyahu said that the incident was a "tactical disagreement" and that President Trump was still the "greatest friend Israel has ever had in the White House". However, the attacks on Lebanon have been a major stumbling block in the peace process with Iran. 

My Comment:

Anti-Israel critics and people that dislike President Trump generally mischaracterize Trump's relation with Israel. They always say that Trump is taking orders from Tel Aviv and that he's not actually in control of America's foreign policy. 

In reality, Israel is the junior partner in this relationship and this little spat is pretty solid proof of that. Trump is more than willing to stand up to Netanyahu when he gets out of line, in Trump's view. Trump and Netanyahu are allies but that does not mean that Trump always does what Netanyahu wants, far from it. 

I also think that Trump was pretty much right about what he said too. Netanyahu has been very annoying lately and he has been derailing the peace process with his attacks on Lebanon. And he is right that Netanyahu is very unpopular for this very reason. 

The problem is that the United States and Israel have different goals in the region. President Trump wants to end the conflicts in the Middle East and to make sure that Iran doesn't get a nuclear weapon that could hit the United States. Israel wants their enemies completely destroyed. I don't think they want a deal where Iran gives up their weapons while keeping the same leadership, they want the Iranian religious government to fall, they want Hezbollah to be destroyed and they want to make sure they are in a strong position against Turkey if something happens there. These goals converge sometimes but I think we are seeing some distance between the two right now. 

I do think that Trump is going to win this fight. Indeed, Israel and Lebanon have already agreed to a conditional cease fire, though that will depend on what Hezbollah did. I think this shows that Trump does have a lot of influence over Israel and their actions, though. It's annoying that Israel may have derailed the peace deal for a few days but it is what it is. 

Finally, I think this will play well for domestic audiences. Trump has been under a lot of criticism for being so supportive of Israel when Israel may be at the lowest point of approval in modern US history. Standing up to Netanyahu is going to play well to Trump's critics on the right that dislike Israel. Those folks aren't critical for the midterms, but it would be nice to get a few of them back on board. 

As for the Iran conflict itself, I haven't been covering it much, mostly because nothing much is happening. We seem to be stuck in a pattern where a deal seem close, but then Israel or the IRGC does something to derail it. Hopefully that pattern will finally break soon an we will see an end to this conflict. 

Outrage in the UK over the Henry Nowak case, a murder victim that police let bleed out after his murderer falsely accused him of racism.

 

Police handout of the victim, Henry Nowak. New York Post. 

Outrage has erupted in the United Kingdom over the Henry Nowak case, where an 18 year old man was stabbed but was arrested by police because the murderer called him racist. New York Post. Nowak, an 18 year old college student, was stabbed by 21 year old Vickrum Digwa, an Indian Sikh man in an unprovoked attack. When police responded to the attack, they believed the attacker over the victim and handcuffed Nowak and read him his rights as he was bleeding to death. Nowak said he had been stabbed and that "I can't breath" while one of the arresting officers said "I don't think you have mate". 

Digwa was convicted for the murder and was sentenced to 21 years, but the bodycam footage of the attack wasn't released until yesterday. The case has exploded racial tensions in the UK as many people felt that the attack was compounded by racism by the police against white people and in favor of South Asian immigrants. Protesters could be heard saying "I can't breath" and unrest has erupted in the UK. The incident is putting pressure on already unpopular Prim Minster Kier Starmer, who protesters have named "Two Tier Kier" for the perception that South Asians are treated better than Whites. 

My Comment:

I have seen the video of Nowak's death and it was pretty baffling. The officers were handcuffing him and weren't actually checking to see how he was until after he was actually dead (a female officer said his eyes were no longer moving). I'm not a police officer but you would think that they would have done a quick check for wounds after he said he had been stabbed and couldn't breath. To be fair, I wasn't able to see any obvious wounds in the video, but it was obvious he was in very deep distress and it seemed obvious he was dying. 

The case has some obvious parallels to the George Floyd case. In that case officers didn't believe a suspect when he said he couldn't breath either and in both cases the arrested person died. But I find this case a lot more outraging than the George Floyd case as the police were at least following policy and I didn't think there was even a hint of racism from the officers there. 

But in this case? It was obviously racism. There was no reason to believe Digwa's claims of racism or to doubt Nowak's claims of being stabbed. Instead, Digwa's claims were believed for no reason and Nowak's were very quickly dismissed. He would have died regardless, his injuries were far too severe, but he could have at least been treated and comforted in his death instead of being treated like a common criminal. You could maybe defend putting him in cuffs until things were figured out, but the fact that Digwa was not shows that he was being discriminated against. 

It's almost beyond parody. The UK police took the possibility of racism (totally false claims) more seriously than a man dying of multiple stab wounds to his chest. And it's a major cultural problem as DEI policies are standard in the UK. The police in this case were trained to see Nowak as a potential criminal and were primed to ignore the idea that Digwa may have been one. Digwa was also able to openly carry a knife, and not just the ceremonial one Sikh people are allowed to carry due to their religion, but an 8 inch blade in a sheath. White people in the UK aren't even allowed to carry pocket knives but this guy was able to carry an 8 inch blade openly? It's a great example of anarcho-tyranny, the actual criminal was able to run amok but the victim gets treated like a criminal.

It's the same ideology that let Pakistani grooming gangs to run amok for many years in the UK. Police in those cases viewed the young white female victims as scum, not people and weren't able to confront the gangs because they didn't want to be accused of racism against South Asians. I can't imagine that something similar wasn't going on here. 

The worst thing is that I don't think anything will change because of this. Yes people are protesting and people are extremely angry but wokeness is way more embedded in the UK. It's official government policy, down from the Prime Minster all the way to the cops on the street. That's not something that changes over night because of one case. I also don't expect anyone in the UK to have a spine. 

But I do think that this case should serve as an example for the rest of the world. This kind of outcome was very obviously possible in the United States and I wouldn't be surprised if something similar has  happened here. Wokeness has been broken here and is retreating but it still exists and this case should be a warning for folks to not let it ever come back. 

Finally, the elephant in the room is why Digwa and his family were in the UK in the first place. Like all crimes committed by immigrants, legal or otherwise, this was a preventable crime. World governments don't even pretend that immigration is good for people who are native to their countries and this is another example.