The New York Times has confirmed that Hunter Biden's laptop was legitimate and that Biden is under investigation. New York Post. The New York Post had broken the story in October of 2020, right before the election, but the story was killed by other media outlets and tech companies like Twitter and Facebook. Hunter Biden had left the laptop, which was full of incriminating photos and evidence linking the younger Biden to Ukraine, via the energy company Bursima. The Times report also said that Biden had been under investigation by the IRS but he had paid $1 million in back taxes.
My Comment:
I'm not linking to the New York Times piece due to the fact that they killed this story when it first came out. The New York Post broke the story back in 2020 and they are the ones that should be getting web traffic via this blog, not the New York Times.
It's utterly insane that it took this long for the Times to admit that the laptop was legitimate in the first place. The story had been confirmed by the person who had possession of the laptop and there was never any implication that the laptop was fake.
Of course, that didn't matter to the media or big tech. They killed the story as hard as they have ever killed any story and I consider it election interference, or reason #1001 why the 2020 election was not legitimate. If the media had covered the story with the amount of outrage the story actually deserved there is no way that Joe Biden would be President right now.
The laptop had evidence of corruption for both Hunter and Joe Biden. Hunter served on the board of Bursima and there is evidence he used that position and the fact that he was Joe Biden's son for corrupt purposes.
And there were of course the personal photos of Hunter Biden that were extremely embarrassing for the Biden family. There were pictures of Hunter having sex with prostitutes, smoking drugs and generally being a scumbag. But what was really disturbing was his relationship with his niece, which may have been inappropriate. Even now those claims are not being investigated.
Of course, all of this is in the context of the war between Ukraine and Russia. It's very clear that there is, at the very least, the appearance of impropriety between Biden and Ukraine. At worst, Biden could be subverting US foreign policy for the sake of his bank account. Would Biden really be so gung-ho against Russia if he wasn't corruptly involved with the government of Ukraine? Is he providing weapons to Ukraine because Zelenskyy didn't rat him out? Did he provoke the Russians to invade so they would destroy evidence of his corruption?
I don't know if any of those things are true but any of those things are plausible. Without an adversarial press and a tech industry that censors the truth, even if those things are true we might not hear about it. But it is a good reminder that everything in the Ukraine war is not what it seems...
No comments:
Post a Comment