More B-2 bombers have been deployed to Diego Garcia, a sign that the war against the Houthis in Yemen is escalating.

 

Satellite photo of Diego Garcia showing six B-2- bombers. Times of Israel/AP.

At least six B-2 stealth bombers have been deployed to Diego Garcia, a sign that the war against the Houthis in Yemen is escalating. Times of Israel. The deployment is highly unusual and comes at a time when a 2nd Carrier Strike Group is heading to the region, headed by the USS Carl Vinson, joining the USS Harry Truman. Attacks against the Houthis have increased as a cease fire fell apart between Hamas and Israel. The Houthis have attacked shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden in response to the war in Gaza. The US Navy has been in heavy combat since then, with some describing the battles as the most intense the Navy has fought since World War II. Over 100 civilian ships have been attacked since the start of the conflict. The Trump administration has been more aggressive in targeting Houthi leadership in addition to missile launch sites.

My Comment:

There are some concerns that these B-2 bombes are not in Diego Garcia for the Yemen War but for a potential war between the United States and Iran. I concede this is possible but I generally think it's unlikely. Tensions with Iran are reasonably high but I don't really see a reason why a war would break out unless something happens, like a first strike against Diego Garcia, which is something I have seen suggested. Is Iran even capable of that? I am not sure, but regardless, I think an actual war with Iran is unlikely. 

So why are these B-2's there? Part of it might because our other heavy bombers are vulnerable to Yemen's fairly formidable anti-air defenses. Remember, the Houthis have shot down at least some drones since strikes have begun, mostly MQ-9 Reapers. It's unclear how many drones have been shot down, the Houthis claim 20, with the most recent being this week, but without confirmation from the United States those numbers are likely inaccurate. But they have had some successes. 

Our non-B-2 bombers, like the B-52 and B-1 are not really designed to go into that kind of combat environment. Should they try to directly engage it's possible that they could be shot down. They could still be used with standoff weapons and large amount of escorts (which may be why the 2nd Carrier Strike Group has been deployed) but I don't think it's worth it. Fighter bombers are better suited for that role and drones can supplement them. 

The real reason is probably due to the fact that Yemen has quite a few fortified bunkers and the B-2 Sprit is the only plane that can use the biggest and most powerful "bunker buster" bombs, the GBU-57a/B MOP.  These bombs can only really be used by the B-2 (with the B-21 not being deployed yet) and they are necessary to destroy some of the heavy bunkers. 

Though I don't think that a war with Iran is likely, it could be that this is some saber rattling as well. Deploying these bombers and using these bunker busters could be a message for them. It's the stick to any carrot that Trump could be offering up for a potential nuclear deal. I don't think President Trump really wants a war, and saber rattling and then cutting a deal has been a very common tactic for him. But the deployment could be about sending a message. 

Finally, it's fairly crazy to me how little coverage the war with the Houthis have gotten. Like the article said, the US Navy is in extremely heavy combat and only got a short break when the cease fire deal in Gaza fell apart. You would think the war would get more coverage but the US media, as always, is out to lunch when it comes to things that are actually important. 

Chaos in the House as a Republican rebellion shuts down votes...

 

Republican Anna Luna led the rebellion. Fox News/Getty.

Two critical House votes have been tabled after a rebellion led by a small group of Republicans. Fox News. The rebellion was led by Representative Anna Luna who wanted legislation to pass that would allow members of congress to vote remotely for 12 weeks after having a child. Luna led an extremely rare Discharge Petition against her own party and was joined by 8 other Republicans and every Democrat in the House. House leadership tried to block the vote but failed as Luna had enough votes. The rebellion led to Speaker Johnson to cancel the rest of the votes this week, including critical votes on the No Rogue Rulings Act and the Safeguarding Voter Eligibility Act. 

My Comment:

What an utter embarrassment and this is why Republicans never seem to get anything accomplished. The core legislation at play here has little to do with the disorder in the house, it's the fact that instead of voting on absolutely critical legislation, Luna pulled a stunt and Johnson angered part of his party in response. Now neither bill is going to be considered and I am furious at both sides. 

I generally disagree with the idea that members of Congress should be able to vote remotely under any circumstances. If they don't want to be there after having a child, they can resign. For your vote to count, you should be in Washington DC. And the whole thing is ridiculous as the House has a child care unit, for free, as a perk of the job. There is absolutely no excuse for new parents in the House to have this vote from home perk when it's not needed at all. 

And Luna's rebellion is not going to play well at all for folks at home. Instead of doing what their base wants, Luna and her allies worked with Democrats (!) to shut down legislation for a niche issue that does not affect American voters in any way whatsoever! Most folks don't get 12 weeks of home work after having a kid and they certainly don't have free child care like members of Congress do. I know a lot of folks are very upset that the issue was even supported by any Republicans at all. 

Of course, Johnson stepped in it too. Instead of allowing this stupid vote to pass and be voted on, he tried to force a rule that would have stopped it. Had he simply allowed the vote to go through, it likely would have passed, which would have been bad optics, but nothing compared to this. He made the wrong choice and now two absolutely critical bills aren't going to go anywhere for at least the next week. 

So instead of voting on a critical legislation, the House ripped itself apart over a niche issue that voters are not going to care about at all, and giving the Democrats a rare win for absolutely no reason. How can Republicans claim to be a serious party if things like this continue to happen? The party won a mandate and the voters kept their part, but the party is absolutely not doing theirs. 

I have never understood why the Republicans constantly shoot themselves in the foot like this. The Democrats, despite being a much more fragmented and dysfunctional party, never seems to have their party pull stunts like this. I don't know if it's something in the psychology of Republicans that force them to fight amongst themselves or if the Democrats have better leadership (in terms of whipping the party). 

Marine Le Pen barred from running in 2027 election in shock conviction.

 

Marine Le Pen, leader of National Rally. BBC/Getty.

Leader of the National Rally and the frontrunner for the 2027 election in France, Marine Le Pen was convicted of an embezzlement charge and will be barred from running. BBC. Le Pen appealed the decision but there would be no hold on the election ban, which will last five years. She was sentenced to 4 years in prison for misuse of EU funds, a crime virtually all political parties in France are guilty of. Due to that and the fact that the ruling would have massive political consequences, nobody really thought Le Pen would be convicted or punished. The conviction has come as a shock to the National Rally Party which now has a very uncertain future. Le Pen was the main draw for the party and it's unclear if she will somehow win her appeal or if she will be replaced, perhaps by Jordan Bardella, the president of the party? Le Pen was projected to get 42% of the vote, more than enough to win the first round of voting in the 2027 election, assuming nothing changes. 

My Comment:

The state of Democracy in the west is pretty deplorable. First there was Trump who was impeached, had an election stolen, he was almost assassinated twice and was convicted of a nonsense crime. He won anyways, but then there was the AFD being shut out in Germany despite being the 2nd most popular party, Romania and Ukraine having their elections canceled, Turkey jailing Erdogan's political opponent and now? Now the leading candidate in France's election, Marine Le Pen has been barred from running in a race she would have almost certainly would have won. 

Is she guilty of what she was convicted of? Probably. From what I understand the misuse of EU funds is pretty much universal among all French political parties, but only Marine Le Pen is getting convicted for it. It's a very obvious example of a two-tiered system. Something tells me if Emmanuel Macron's center left party won't be charged under the same laws. 

La Pen was likely to win in 2027. Macron has made a mess of things and Le Pen is fairly popular. But she's been labeled far-right, and for once the slur might have at least a little proof to it. Her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen, was canceled for not denouncing Nazis enough, though his daughter had little to do with that. There are folks that say that Le Pen was a liability for National Rally for this reason.

Though I am guessing it both her semi-skeptical views on Ukraine and immigration that are the real reason this case was brought. Both things are very unpopular among the normal folks but Europe has been pulling out all the stops to prevent anyone from seriously challenging it. 

If there is any good news for National Front, it's the fact that they have a lot of time to figure it out. The next election isn't until 2027, so that should be enough time to either double down on Le Pen or replace her with someone else. I am guessing they will keep their options open though right now it is far too early to figure out what they will actually be doing. 

The main problem I see for the powers that be is that this will almost certainly make Le Pen into a martyr. That is exactly how it happened with Donald Trump and though Le Pen might not be able to run in 2027, folks will vote for National March just because they are upset about what happened to her. Would Trump have won in 2024 if it wasn't for the shame prosecution? Maybe but it certainly helped him out. I think the same thing could very well happen in France in 2027... 

New Mexico GOP headquarters attacked in apparent arson incident.

 

The damage done to the GOP headquarters in Albuquerque New Mexico. Fox News/New Mexico GOP.

The New Mexico GOP headquarters was attacked in an apparent arson incident. Fox News. Firefighters responded to the fire shortly after the attack, greatly limiting the damage. No injuries were caused but the building suffered damage to the front doors and smoke damage inside. A political motive seems obvious as the building also had been vandalized with spray-paint saying "ICE=KKK". The attack is one of a series against Republicans, or people perceived to be Republicans, since Trump was sworn in as president. Local Democrats condemned the attack while law enforcement at the local and federal level investigate the attacks.  

My Comment:

Looks like another politically motivated attack against Republicans, this time in New Mexico. New Mexico is a semi-solid blue state so it's not like Republicans are actually doing much in the state. This is pure spite by the folks that did this. 

The wave of terrorism we are seeing reminds me of the days of rage back in the 1970's. Back then there was a large amount of attacks against the system conducted by far left activists. A few people even died during these attacks. Back then it was mostly the Vietnam war but today it's, well, I am not sure why these folks are even upset. 

The situation isn't exactly the same now though. Back then the militant left was on the ascent but today they are on a serious decline. The attack on the GOP headquarters in New Mexico and the attacks on Tesla across the nation (despite the cars mainly being owned by leftists) are a rear-guard action for a movement that lost all credibility after Donald Trump was elected for a 2nd term. 

If this attack is an anti-immigration enforcement action, then it's another example of how out of touch these folks are. Very few people are on the side of the illegal immigrants, especially the ones that are actual gang members. It's an 80-20 issue that the left is on the wrong side of. I guess it's possible the attack was conducted by an illegal immigrant but my guess is that this was done by antifa or a similar group. 

I do think it's only a matter of time before someone is hurt or killed in these kinds of attacks. Honestly, given the assassination attempt on Trump where he himself was injured along with a few other people, and a man, Corey Comperatore, was killed, they kind of already have been. In this case there wasn't anyone at the GOP headquarters when it was attacked but if folks had been there and the fire department wasn't on the ball, someone could have been hurt or killed. 

The problem is that I am not exactly impressed with how the Justice Department and FBI are being led right now. Kash Patel hasn't done much and what Pam Bondi has done is mostly go on Fox News and talked instead of actually doing anything to stop the problem. 

And I think if they put the effort in they could. The entire FBI was directed to focus on the folks that protested on January 6th so we know they have the ability to go after people if they actually want to. I am guessing the anti-Trump and anti-Tesla networks could have been disrupted easily if the FBI was actually trying. But as of now they are not and it's not great that we aren't seeing the same kind of reform at Justice as we are in other aspects in government. 

California under investigation for law that hides changes in "gender identity" from parents.

 

California Governor Gavin Newsom on his podcast with conservative pundit Charlie Kirk. Fox News/This is Gavin Newsom podcast.

California is under investigation for a law that hides changes in "gender identity" from parents. Fox News. The Department of Education launched the investigation after alleged violations of the Family Educational Rights Privacy Act (FERPA), which allows parents access to information pertaining to their children at schools. The Trump administration has said that the law would cover things like gender identity and mental health.  Assembly Bill 1955 was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom last year and it prevents teachers from disclosing information about sexual orientation, gender identity or expression without the consent of the student. Critics say the law protects students from being "outed" to their parents. The Department of Education also issued a separate warning about the executive order that prevents biological males from participating in sports, which could lead to a cut of funding. Newsom agreed on his podcast that transgender athletes participating in woman's sports is "deeply unfair" but has not as of yet changed any policies. 

My Comment:

How you react to this story is probably dependent on what actually is the source of homosexuality and transgenderism. The old "nature vs nurture" debate. If you are on the side of "nature" you think that those things are caused by genetics or some other natural cause and in that case you might think that the California law is just. On the other hand, if you think that this behavior is due to "nurture", or more specifically culture, you would probably think that the law is terrible. 

I am not really sure. I'm pretty confident that Transgenderism is a meme, not in an offensive sense, but under the original version of the term, as coined by Richard Dawkins. I generally think most of the non-LGB portion of the LGBTQ spectrum are the result of memes, cultural transmission of ideas. I'm more convinced that the LGB portion of the spectrum is something you are born with, but I am not 100% convinced. But I would be shocked if transgenderism is not some kind of culturally transmitted fad, at least to some degree. 

It's a good example of the fundamental disagreement with transgender ideology. They claim that there is no such thing as grooming someone into being transgender, it's something you are born with, but that is the fear that justifies this intervention from the Trump Administration. If the skeptics are right then hiding gender identity from parents prevents them from trying to correct the behavior and causing them to revert to their "natural" state. Transgender folks see this as "genocide" (really).

They would also argue that this could result in abuse if children are outed, either as homosexual or transgender. I guess this is possible but that's not a reason to not do it. I am absolutely not supportive of anyone that abuses kids for any reason, but the fact remains that parental rights should always outweigh hypothetical scenarios. If they do abuse their kids then sure, arrest and punish them, but you don't punish everyone because the potential actions of a few. 

I do think that this is a battle that Gavin Newsom is likely to lose. He's already wavering on "trans rights" as we saw with his statements earlier in the month about transgender athletes. I think he realizes, unlike much of the Democratic base, that this issue is deeply unpopular and the only real support comes from the transgender community itself and a few true believer allies. It's been described as an 80/20 issue, but I am guessing support might be even lower, even in a very liberal state like California. 

The real question is if Newsom is going to cut these people loose and wave the white flag. Not doing so could absolutely torpedo his presidential ambitions. It could even result in Republicans taking the governorship of California once Newsom is gone. My read on him is that he is a savvy, if cynical, political operator and he's likely to jettison this issue as fast as he can...